While the Middle East conflict has added volatility, the shock should still be viewed as cyclical and oil-driven rather than structurally market-breaking.
- MFS notes that in 19 of the last 22 geopolitical conflicts, markets were higher 12 months later, reinforcing the case against reacting to headline volatility.
- The key transmission channel remains oil, with inflation expectations and economic uncertainty likely to matter more than the conflict itself.
- Their advice is to stay focused on quality compounders, avoid overly cyclical exposures, and remember that time in the market usually beats timing the market.
For investors approaching retirement, the bigger risk may not be volatility itself—but making structural portfolio changes in response to temporary shocks.
Dit artikel verder lezen?
Abonneer en krijg toegang tot Investment Officer Nederland:
- Exclusief voor professionele beleggers
- Altijd opzegbaar
- Onbeperkt toegang: web, app, nieuwsbrieven en events
Registreer gratis en krijg toegang tot Investment Officer België:
- Exclusief voor professionele beleggers
- Altijd opzegbaar
- Onbeperkt toegang: web, app, nieuwsbrieven en events
Registreren duurt minder dan 1 minuut.
Geen betaalgegevens vereist
